A.J. Hinch Calls Tigers' Devastating Loss 'Punch to the Face' As Free Fall Continues

The Detroit Tiegrs are free falling.

Clinging to a 5-4 lead against the Braves in the top of the ninth inning and looking to end a four-game losing streak, manager A.J. Hinch called upon closer Will Vest to shut the door during Saturday's game. Instead, the Braves kicked the door open, rallying for two runs to take the lead and eventually, win the game.

For the Tigers—who have seen an AL Central lead that was once 15 1/2 games over the Guardians dwindle to just 1 1/2 as Cleveland continues to surge—it was the worst case scenario.

"Difficult to accept, difficult to explain," Hinch said Saturday after the loss. "It's hard trying to put into words what is going on. But I know how much we fought today. I know how well we played. Some big emotional swings and an absolute punch right to the face. Frustrating day, but I'm going to try to grab some of the good that came out of some good swings, some excellent bullpen work.

"Some emotional swings that went our favor and some high-end plays. It's hard to like much of anything right now."

Since September 1, the Tigers offense ranks 21st in runs scored, while the pitching staff has struggled to the tune of the sixth-worst ERA during that span. Not exactly a recipe for winning baseball at any time, but especially in the heat of a division race.

Meanwhile, Cleveland, once seemingly left for dead in the push for the postseason, is now within striking distance of first place in the AL Central with under 10 games remaining. A three-game series against the Guardians, beginning on Sept. 23, looms particularly large.

Five epic batsman-bowler duels

Rivalries that defined eras and gave for unforgettable contests between bat and ball

Mohammad Isam12-Jun-2020Viv Richards v Dennis Lillee
In the 1970s and 80s, the West Indies-Australia contest was the pinnacle of cricket, and Lillee and Richards were its main protagonists. In the first series they played against each other, in 1975, Lillee, who had recovered from a career-threatening spine injury the previous year, took 27 wickets in a 5-1 home win for Australia. He dismissed the 23-year-old Richards five times, but on three of those occasions Richards had already past 50.In 1977, both players signed for Kerry Packer’s World Series of Cricket – the duel between them was marketed as one of the key plots of the rebel tournament. They had some of their best contests there, with Lillee dismissing Richards eight times.They were back playing international cricket by 1979, and Richards began to dominate the contest, scoring 386 runs at 96.50 in West Indies’ 2-1 away series victory in Australia in 1979-80, with Lillee dismissing him just twice. Lillee’s big moment against his rival came in the MCG Boxing Day Test of 1981, when he bowled Richards late on the first evening of what turned out to be a close match. Lillee got his career-best figures of 7-83 in that same innings, and the Richards dismissal was the iconic moment from it.Overall, Richards won the contest, averaging 48.73 in Tests featuring Lillee, though he was also dismissed nine times by him in Tests, more than by any other bowler. In a recent interview with ESPNcricinfo, Richards said Lillee was the one opponent who kept him up at night.Steve Waugh v Wasim Akram
In the 13 Tests he played against Akram, Waugh was dismissed four times by him. In their most thrilling battle, however, Waugh survived some of Akram’s fiercest bowling, showing his legendary toughness. In the 1994 Rawalpindi Test, Akram was presented with a green pitch and decided to test Waugh’s well-documented vulnerability against the short ball.”It was the quickest, meanest [spell] I’d ever seen,” Waugh wrote of Akram’s barrage in his autobiography, . “Wasim either didn’t like me or I was in the wrong place at the wrong time. Nothing was in my half of the wicket and it was all genuinely quick, the ball leaping off the pitch with spite and venom.”Waugh hopped about but, crucially, survived, and got 98 before playing on against Waqar Younis. The effort earned him Akram’s respect. “He didn’t middle a ball in my spell – I was beating him, and he was leaving a lot of balls,” Akram told the . “But he stood there and got 98 and that was very, very impressive. I just wanted to kill him, as a bowler. That was probably the quickest I’ve ever bowled.”Gotcha! Flintoff tormented Ponting in the 2005 Ashes but Australia’s captain hit back in 2006-07•Getty ImagesSachin Tendulkar v Glenn McGrath
While the much anticipated Tendulkar vs Shane Warne contest ended up being a bit one-sided, the Tendulkar v McGrath battle produced memorable moments and became the one that defined India-Australia matches of the 1990s and early 2000s.McGrath dismissed Tendulkar in their first meeting, in Sharjah in 1994, but two years later, Tendulkar hit his rival for some big shots, including a famous six over midwicket, during his 90 against Australia in the 1996 World Cup. In a must-win game at the 1999 World Cup, Tendulkar was dismissed by McGrath for a duck, which was seen as the final blow to India’s campaign.Things really heated up on India’s 1999-2000 tour of Australia. In Adelaide, umpire Daryl Harper infamously gave Tendulkar out lbw when hit on the shoulder while trying to duck under a Mcgrath bouncer that didn’t get up. In Melbourne, Tendulkar played McGrath cautiously while attacking the other bowlers on his way to 116 and 52. But in Sydney, both attacked, and in an epic over, Tendulkar took consecutive pulled boundaries off McGrath and then, when the bowler went fuller, drove him down the ground. McGrath responded by dismissing Tendulkar lbw off the last ball of the over with an inswinger.Another memorable contest ensued a year later, in Nairobi, in the first ICC KnockOut, which would later become the Champions Trophy. Tendulkar was in a belligerent mood, getting 33 runs off 30 balls from McGrath, including a six down the ground and one over midwicket. Most surprisingly, Tendulkar, apparently, sledged his opponent. He admitted as much in later interviews, saying he had done it to put McGrath off his game. “That’s one of the games I remember where I didn’t say a word at all. He was the one sledging me,” McGrath told ESPNcricinfo in an interview in 2005.McGrath had the big moments in the second half of the rivalry, dismissing Tendulkar in Test wins in Mumbai (2001) and Nagpur (2004) and in the first over of India’s chase in the 2003 World Cup final. In all, he got Tendulkar six times in Tests and seven times in ODIs.Brian Lara v Muttiah Muralitharan
Ahead of West Indies’ 2001 tour of Sri Lanka, Brian Lara’s Test average had dipped below 50. He responded by preparing harder than ever for the tour. Muralitharan had just gone past 350 wickets. He had tormented some of the world’s best batsmen, particularly on home pitches. Lara amassed 688 runs at 114.66 in the series and was dismissed just twice by Muralitharan. It was a staggering tally considering just one other West Indies batsman got more than 200 runs in the series as they were beaten 3-0. Muralitharan took 24 wickets, with two ten-wicket hauls, but could not unsettle Lara.Lara credited Sir Garry Sobers for his improved technique and said they key was avoiding cross-batted shots like the sweep and watching the ball from the spinner’s hand. Muralitharan has always maintained that Lara was the batsman who played him best.Ricky Ponting v Andrew Flintoff
Flintoff to Ponting, over number 13, fourth innings, Edgbaston, 2005 Ashes, third session on day three, Test match on the line – one of the most memorable overs in modern cricket history. With Australia chasing 282 to make it 2-0 in the series, Flintoff dismissed Justin Langer off the second ball of his first over of the innings to make it 47 for 1. Ponting walked in, and Flintoff, bowling at above 90mph, rapped him on the pads, then took a thick inside edge, before hitting the pads again. With one ball left in the over, he bowled one wide of off, and the umpire called a no-ball. The seventh ball was a fast outswinger, angling in and then straightening late. Ponting stabbed, nicked, and walked off for a duck. One of the best batsmen of his era, with a Test average of more than 58, had been worked over.That was in the second Test the two played against each other, and the rivalry continued for the next four years. Ponting fell to Flintoff again in the fifth Test in 2005 and succumbed to him twice during the ICC Super Tests later in the year. But he turned the tables when Flintoff toured Australia as captain in 2006-07. Ponting scored 576 runs at 82.28 and was out just once to Flintoff as Australia won 5-0. Two years later, in his final Test, the decider of the 2009 Ashes, Flintoff ran Ponting out with a direct hit from mid-on to seal the series for England.

'What's the point of technology if it cannot be used?'

Did a wrong call cost Kings XI Punjab the match against Delhi Capitals? Here are the reactions on Twitter following that dramatic finish

ESPNcricinfo staff21-Sep-2020A few, including Kings XI Punjab co-owner Preity Zinta – in attendance at the venue, wondered if it’s time for technology to be used.

Kings XI Punjab went on to lose the game in the Super Over.

Time for the authorities to look at these closely?

It was a thrilling game nonetheless.

A fine 89 off 60 balls from Mayank Agarwal did not result in a win for his team.

Here’s what our readers thought about the decision on the short run.

Well, Super Overs ain’t new for Jimmy Neesham.

How many bowlers have taken a five-for against the Mumbai Indians?

And who holds the record for the most wicketkeeping dismissals in the IPL?

Steven Lynch10-Nov-2020Was the recent huge partnership by Will Pucovski and Marcus Harris the highest by two Australians? asked Geoff Reynolds from Australia
That opening stand of 486 by Will Pucovski (who scored 255 not out) and Marcus Harris (239) for Victoria against South Australia in Adelaide recently was the highest for any wicket in the Sheffield Shield, beating 464 (unbroken) by the Waugh twins for New South Wales against Western Australia in Perth in 1990-91.But it wasn’t quite the largest partnership in first-class cricket by two Australians. That came in an extraordinary match at Blacktown Oval in Sydney in 2015-16, when openers Ryan Carters (209) and Aaron Finch (288 not out) put on 503 for a Cricket Australia XI against the New Zealand tourists – at which point the match was abandoned as the pitch was deemed unsafe. This is not quite as strange as it sounds: the wicket was deteriorating badly, and the New Zealanders had used spinners and occasional bowlers for the last part of the CA XI’s innings.Australia’s highest partnership in Tests remains the 451 of Bill Ponsford (266) and Don Bradman (244) for the second wicket against England at The Oval in 1934.Is it true that no one has yet taken a five-for against the Mumbai Indians? asked Kishore Mehta from India
It is true that no one has yet taken five wickets in an innings against Mumbai Indians in the IPL. And the identity of the man with the best figures against them comes as a bit of a surprise: it’s Rohit Sharma, now their captain, who took 4 for 6 with his offbreaks against Mumbai for Deccan Chargers in Centurion, South Africa, in 2009. Sharma has taken just 15 IPL wickets all told, only one of them since 2010.Mumbai are the only current team that has not conceded a five-for in the IPL. No one had done it against the Delhi Capitals until a fortnight ago, when Varun Chakravarthy took 5 for 20 for Kolkata Knight Riders in Abu Dhabi. However, both Lasith Malinga and Jaydev Unadkat took five-fors against Delhi when the team was known as the Daredevils. Here is the list of the best bowling figures in the IPL.Quinton de Kock has made 20 dismissals in the current IPL. Is he near the record for a wicketkeeper in one tournament? asked Mehdi Balasingam from India
After the first qualifier in Dubai last Thursday evening, the Mumbai Indians’ wicketkeeper Quinton de Kock had 20 dismissals (16 catches and four stumpings) in this season’s tournament. That’s one more than he managed last year. But he needs four victims in the final to tie the record for one season, also set last year, by Rishabh Pant for the Delhi Capitals: he had 18 catches and six stumpings, for a total of 24.The best bowling figures against the Mumbai Indians are by their current captain Rohit Sharma, from when he was with the Deccan Chargers in 2009•Associated PressDean Elgar scored 101 out of 150 for the Titans recently. What is the lowest first-class total to include a century? asked Savo Ceprnich from South Africa
There have been only four all-out innings lower than the Titans’ 150 against the Cape Cobras in Cape Town last week that contained an individual century – in this case Elgar’s 101, with Junior Dala’s 18 being the next-best score.Lowest of all is 143, which has happened twice – first when another South African, Clive Rice, made 105 not out for Nottinghamshire against Hampshire in Bournemouth in 1981 (next best was Tim Robinson’s 10). That was equalled by Gujranwala in Pakistan’s Quaid-e-Azam Trophy in 2001-02, when their 143 in Bahawalpur included a round 100 from Rizwan Malik. Kent’s 144 against Warwickshire in Folkestone in 1931 featured an unbeaten 103 from Frank Woolley, while when the Parsees were all out for 148 against the Europeans in Bombay (now Mumbai) in 1907-08, Rustomji Meherhomji scored exactly 100.If you don’t insist on an all-out innings, the lowest first-class total to include a century is Faisalabad’s 128 for 1 against Sargodha in Faisalabad in 2000-01, when Mohammad Ramzan – who had hit 205 in the first innings – scored 102 not out, Mohammad Salman 9, and Fida Hussain 7 not out.Blessing Muzarabani took wickets with the last two balls he bowled in last week’s tied ODI, then another with the first ball of the Super Over. Will this count as a hat-trick? asked Vishal Rao from India
The tall Zimbabwean seamer Blessing Muzarabani took a career-best 5 for 49 against Pakistan in the third one-day international in Rawalpindi last week, rounding it off with the wickets of Shaheen Shah Afridi and Babar Azam with the last two balls of the match. He then started the Super Over with the wicket of Iftikhar Ahmed.Sadly for Muzarabani, neither his unusual hat-trick nor his overall figures of 7 for 51 will feature in the official lists: when eliminator overs were introduced a few years ago, the ICC decreed that performances in them shouldn’t count towards a player’s individual record. While this is rather tough luck on Muzarabani, I suppose it is in line with most other sports: football, for example, does not count goals scored in penalty shootouts in a player’s overall career tally.Use our feedback form or the Ask Steven Facebook page to ask your stats and trivia questions

James Anderson delivers another performance to treasure on day of England toil

Wickets and economy in tough conditions prove once again how versatile England’s senior seamer is

George Dobell22-Jan-2021It would probably be stretching things a little to compare James Anderson to Dame Judi Dench, Sir David Attenborough or even the late Queen mother.But, as he rose above the conditions to produce another outstanding performance – a performance that kept his side in this match despite losing an important toss – the thought occurred: he’s been around forever, he’s reliably excellent and it’s hard to avoid the suspicion they don’t make them like this anymore. He is, despite the chuntering – which is rarer these days – well on the road to becoming a national treasure.Anderson could have been forgiven for letting out a sigh of despair when England were sentenced to a day in the field. There was nothing for him here: not seam; not swing; not pace. Just oppressive humidity and a temperature that would have a tomato loosening its collar. For a man who claimed just one Test wicket on the last tour of Sri Lanka, it might have been an intimidating prospect.But so great is Anderson’s control, so impressive his array of skills, he found a way to not just build pressure but claim his best Test figures in Sri Lanka since 2012. Despite his age, he delivered 19 overs in the day – 10 of them maidens – conceding just 24 for his three wickets. And so high are his standards, so much does he detest conceding runs, he still left the pitch grumbling to himself after a rare loose ball in the last over of the day allowed Niroshan Dickwella to flick one off his legs for four.Related

Joe Root passes Geoff Boycott as fluent batting form sets England agenda

Grant Flower pleased with Sri Lanka application despite 'giving them three wickets'

Mark Wood finds relief in rare breakthrough as hard graft earns overdue reward

Angelo Mathews edges day for Sri Lanka after arm-wrestle with James Anderson

Bowling, like batting, isn’t just about doing the right thing. It’s every bit as much about not doing the wrong thing. And what Anderson is able to achieve better than most, is an ability to marry variation without releasing pressure.So here, despite the lack of assistance, he was able to gain a fraction of reverse-swing, a hint of bounce and a scintilla of seam movement. Combined with his control, it allowed him to prey on batsmen’s insecurities and impatience. So if the wicket of Kusal Perera – “trying to hit me over the fort,” as Anderson put it to the BBC – was a touch fortuitous, perhaps he earned it by starting with a maiden and making it clear that the batsman was having nothing for free.The wicket of Lahiru Thirimanne was probably the most pleasing. Having probed around the off stump from round the wicket throughout the first session, early in the second Anderson persuaded one to leave the batsman, taking the outside edge as Thirimanne pushed at it. At that stage, he had 3 for 4 in his sixth over.It was revealing that Anderson admitted he was uncharacteristically nervous going into this game. It had been five months since he had played, after all. He was replacing his old friend Stuart Broad who had done such a sterling job in the first game. – “they’re big shoes to fill,” Anderson said – and, in his four most-recent Tests in Asia, he had claimed only one wicket across 85 overs. When you’re 38, such spells can be interpreted as symptoms of a terminal decline.

England’s spinners contributed just four maidens between them and conceded more runs per over than Wood and Anderson. For Bess to deliver fewer overs than Anderson is telling

But we have surely learned not to write-off Anderson. Like Broad, he demonstrates his hunger by retaining his fitness and continuing to develop new skills. And as much as the England management know they have to plan for the future, the fact is Broad and Anderson have so far bowled 45 overs in this series. 24 of them have been maidens and they’ve claimed six wickets for just 58 runs. The bar for Olly Stone and co is set impossibly high. England’s other seamers have claimed 3 for 198 between them.With all that in mind, you could make a strong case to argue this performance – in conditions – was of more value than several of those five-fors claimed on green surfaces and with a Duke’s ball in England. These are the conditions in which Anderson’s critics say he is impotent, after all.In truth, Anderson’s reputation as effective only at home doesn’t really stand up to scrutiny. While his bowling is clearly best suited to conditions in England, his record in Asia compares favourably to many of the best in the business. He averages 30.14 across 22-and-a-half Tests in the region. By comparison to other top seamers of the age – Ishant Sharma averages 32.14 in Asia, Kagiso Rabada 34.52, Mohammad Amir 50.46, Vernon Philander 38.06 and Zaheer Khan 34.46 – that is excellent.Dale Steyn, it should be noted, claimed his Test wickets in Asia at 24.11, while Pat Cummins, in a small sample size of four Tests, averages 29.71.Anderson won especially fine support from Mark Wood. The figures don’t show it, but Wood has been immense in this series and finally claimed his first wicket during an eight-over spell before the arrival of the second new ball.You wonder what Wood makes of the way he’s used by England. He always looks willing; he always runs in with complete commitment. But he played just one Test in helpful conditions during the English summer and he rarely sees anything like a new ball. To then use him in back-to-back matches on surfaces offering him so little assistance… The decision not to award him a full central contract looks more ridiculous by the moment.Jack Leach didn’t find much purchase from the Galle pitch•SLCEngland’s issue – and it really is a big issue given they are about to head to India for four Tests – is that that can’t really rely on their spinners to retain control on flat pitches. Dom Bess and Jack Leach didn’t, by any means, bowl badly. It’s okay that they don’t have the weapons to trouble good batsmen in such conditions. In the key stand, against Angelo Mathews and Dinesh Chandimal, they were up against two men averaging more than 40 in Test cricket on a surface that would have tested any spinner. Indeed, Bess bowled far better than in the first innings of the first Test when he finished with figures of 5 for 30.But what England would like, is just a little more control. And here the spinners contributed just four maidens between them and conceded more runs per over than Wood and Anderson. For Bess, 23, to deliver fewer overs than Anderson is telling. “I wasn’t expecting to bowl that many overs,” Anderson admitted afterwards.This was, in some ways, an old-fashioned day’s cricket. And absorbing, in its own way. We’ve been spoiled, really. In the not-so-good old days – before opening batsmen reacted to the introduction of spin by attempting to reverse-sweep them past the slip cordon – this is what Test cricket was like. For those who don’t remember, at one point in the 1960s, England drew seven Tests in succession and 13 out of 15.Often, in such circumstances, England’s lack of variation is bemoaned. But they had plenty here: they had pace, left-arm angle and two spinners turning the ball – well, trying to – in opposite directions to one another.These things are not a silver bullet. Sometimes attrition is the only way. And whatever the conditions, wherever the game, it seems England’s elder statesmen remain the answer to their captain’s prayers. England know they have to move on at some stage. But, when you’ve become accustomed to such standards and have something this special, you’re going to be very reluctant to waste a drop of it.

Rohit Sharma answers litmus test with calm assurance

He has done his homework diligently, and has been a reassuring presence for India at the top

Nagraj Gollapudi12-Aug-20211:47

Laxman: This innings will work as a template for Rohit Sharma going forward

Till James Anderson did what only he can do, Rohit Sharma made us think ahead of ourselves. What would he do if he became the first Indian batter to score a Test century at Lord’s since Ajinkya Rahane in 2014? Would he do Misbah-ul-Haq style push-ups? Would he passionately kiss the badge on his helmet like Michael Slater? Or would he just be Rohit Sharma, and flash a sunlit smile to the dressing room, and his wife and daughter?You can get carried away easily by Rohit. KL Rahul has beautiful hands that unleash gorgeous drives, but even he would agree that few make batting look as easy as when Rohit is in full flow. And when he flows, the opposition shudders.The beauty about Rohit is that he will not get saddled with doubts and worries and what-ifs. Take the pull off the first bouncer England fired at him at the stroke of lunch on the second morning at Trent Bridge. Without even a blink, Rohit swivelled in his crease to pull Ollie Robinson high, but straight to Sam Curran at deep fine leg.Related

Laxman's advice to Rohit: 'Focus on leaving outside off'

KL Rahul and Rohit Sharma make it comfortably India's day at Lord's

“If I see the ball in my area I have to play the shot. That’s my shot. I have got runs playing that shot,” Rohit explained to the media later that day.He was not being cocky. Having studied batters who have succeeded in England, Rohit felt the way to do that was look to score while respecting the conditions. That is also his strength. His great success in white-ball cricket allows Rohit to punish bad balls effortlessly, like he did when he hit four boundaries in a single over from Curran in the first session.However, Rohit has not tried to hit his way out of difficult questions asked by the opposition. Instead, in the short time he has been opening in Test cricket overseas, one standout factor has been his defensive game outside the off stump.Assured footwork, judging lengths and lines accurately to leave balls alone or take a big stride – all these factors have allowed Rohit to stay solid at the crease, having batted thrice in this series, each time walking out with Rahul under overcast conditions, confronted by clinical and probing spells of fast bowling from Anderson and Robinson in particular.That Rohit has been ready is only because he has been doing his homework diligently. On Wednesday, Rohit, Rahane and Cheteshwar Pujara were the only three Indians at an optional training session. The session might have lasted about three quarters of an hour but Rohit’s sole focus was whether he was judging the lengths and the seam position well while leaving balls that pitched on a length in the channel. It did not matter when at times he was beaten, or the ball sharply slanted into his pads, or he was opened up by a zinger. What mattered was he was reacting to the ball. And each time the ball was short, Rohit played shot.That mindset came into play on Thursday morning when England took advantage of the cloudy conditions and a pitch full of moisture by throttling the run rate. After the first 10 overs India had just 11 runs. After the first hour they had 35. It was the same pattern in both innings at Trent Bridge, where India started watchfully and then built momentum quickly. The 97-run alliance between the openers in the first innings at Trent Bridge was India’s highest opening stand outside Asia since 2010. On Thursday, they bettered that by putting on 126.In the first two decades of this century, Indian openers had batted for more than 20 overs in an innings on just five occasions in South Africa, England, New Zealand and Australia. In 2021 alone, Rohit – along with Shubman Gill before this series and Rahul now – has helped India last at least 20 overs five time already in those countries.Rohit Sharma acknowledges the cheers after getting to his half-century•Getty ImagesOne reason Rohit has been successful as a Test opener is because he has worked out the balance between attack and defence. In the first hour of the second session, Mark Wood had a chuckle after squaring him up with a fast legcutter delivered from wide of the crease. Rohit did not mind. Presented with a short 142kmh/88mph delivery on the middle stump, he quickly moved outside the line of the delivery to pull it for a boundary.The last ball of the same over, Rohit nearly chased a wider delivery, on the fuller side, but backed out at the very last moment. That he could resist any temptation was because, just like Rahul, he kept the bat close to his body, stayed still in the crease, and had not pushed or poked unnecessarily. One way to measure the success of both Rohit and Rahul is to see how England have played on the vulnerabilities of the duo that come after them, Pujara and Virat Kohli, in the first two Tests – despite their vast experience, both batters have attempted to play at deliveries which Rohit and Rahul were mostly leaving.Late in the afternoon, Rohit stood up to applaud Rahul when the latter became the first Indian to score a century in the series. More than having missed a chance to raise the bat, Rohit would have celebrated his opening partner’s success because he had played a big role in the first two sessions when Rahul played the holding role.This series was going to be the litmus test for Rohit, the Test opener. He has answered that with calm assurance.As for how he might celebrate when he gets to the landmark, we can wait for that.

Sri Lanka might not be winning, but aren't you excited by this talented, young bunch?

Led by the impressive Wanindu Hasaranga, they’ve sparked joy at this tournament. The question now is: will the board do right by them?

Andrew Fidel Fernando02-Nov-2021There is reason to be optimistic – and this will eventually become that sort of column – but first let us lay a lavish offering of caveats at the altar of fate. The first law of Sri Lankan cricket is that things never turn out as well as you hope. The second law, to which the first is subject, is that Sri Lankan cricket would never deign to conform to anything as prosaic as a law, you idiot.You’re beginning to see the problem here, no? Every time the men’s team gets whitewashed or crashes out of a tournament and Sri Lankan cricket seems in its death throes, it rises irrepressible, a vampire from a coffin, out for one more wild night (remember the 2019 Test series in South Africa?).Conversely – and here is what really worries – the dawns have had a tendency to be false. Anyone else recall that Test whitewash over Australia, in which a 21-year-old Kusal Mendis played one of the great innings, was labelled “the prince” by a usually reserved Graham Ford, and was the guy that would pick up the baton that had passed from Roy Dias, to Aravinda de Silva, to Mahela Jayawardene, but which had been dropped when Kumar Sangakkara retired? Apparently that was only five years ago, but since then, Mendis has had ups, downs, ducks, clashes with media, clashes with fans, a fatal car crash where he was the driver, and a Covid-rule-breaking night out that landed him a 12-month suspension: misadventures enough to pack out a decades-long career, all while he struggled desperately to live up to that early promise.Now that the mood has been sufficiently hoovered, though, let’s get down to what we’re here for. Sri Lanka have not just exceeded expectations this T20 World Cup, in a little-too-tipsy-at-karaoke kinda way, they’ve also been fun. It starts with the bowlers, as so many good things about cricket must. Dushmantha Chameera, a little more muscle now than he used to have, but vitally, also more swing and control, has touched 150kph in his powerplay overs, and delivered some of the tournament’s meanest bouncers, of which no less a batter than Quinton de Kock was the latest victim. Joining him on the higher reaches of the speed charts has been Lahiru Kumara, whose bowling radar still needs work, but whose age – 24 – should give him plenty of time to work on that accuracy.And it is that youth from which belief springs, even when, as now, they’ve lost three consecutive matches. Opener Pathum Nissanka is 23, but only Jos Buttler and Babar Azam have scored more than his 170 runs so far this tournament. Charith Asalanka, 24, hit Sri Lanka’s best match-winning innings, an 80 not out off 49 balls that formed the spine of the biggest second-innings total so far of the World Cup. Elsewhere, a 21-year-old Maheesh Theekshana has held his nerve against some of the most explosive batters on the planet, and Bhanuka Rajapaksa – a little older at 30 – has provided some desperately-needed middle-order firepower.

Here is a theory: Sri Lanka’s still produces cricketers with sufficient talent to make an impression upon arrival at the top level, but whose flaws have survived the inadequate domestic system and these are then ruthlessly targeted by international sides

The steepest rise, of course, has belonged to 24-year-old Wanindu Hasaranga, who only made it into the T20 side in late 2019, and despite being inactive most of last year due to the pandemic, has almost indisputably now become one of the half-dozen most valuable T20I players in the world. He is arguably the bowler of this tournament too; of his 14 wickets so far, eight have come in the Super 12 stage, and he’s been effective at every phase, taking two wickets in the powerplay against England, dominating the middle overs against South Africa, wily at the death. It sounds like blasphemy but, in this tournament, his googly has almost reached the Lasith Malinga yorker for they-know-it’s-coming-but-they’re-still-getting-out-to-it value. All but one of his World Cup wickets are from that ball.You suspect that for many of these players, the next 18 months of being subjected to intense analyst scrutiny could be the make-or-break. Since we are too woke to accredit Sri Lanka’s sudden swings in fortunes to an oriental unknowability, here is a theory: Sri Lanka’s still produces cricketers with sufficient talent to make an impression upon arrival at the top level, but whose flaws have survived the inadequate domestic system and these are then ruthlessly targeted by international sides. The board has for years promised a more rigorous domestic competition, but is yet to deliver. And beyond this how long will they keep Mickey Arthur, under whose watch several of these players have improved substantially, around? In recent years, the board’s response to even the mildest crisis (the caterers didn’t use enough salt) was to sack the coach, replace the captain, replace the selectors, or do all of the above, before the new appointees favour a whole different set of players and ideas, and the cycle begins again. This is why we can’t have nice things.But perhaps more for this side than for any other over the past few years, it is vital that Sri Lanka sticks by them. With any luck, they’ll all stay together for the next five years. Collectively, their talent ceiling is high. Sure, they’ve won just one match in the Super 12s, got nowhere near the semi-final and, fine, been thoroughly outplayed in key moments, but they have, in their own way, and for the first time in a long while, sparked joy.

Australia's 1998 tour of Pakistan: 'It was one of our finest achievements to beat them'

Mark Taylor’s side is one of only two Australian teams to have won a Test series in the country

Andrew McGlashan and Tristan Lavalette28-Feb-20222:06

McDonald: Touring Pakistan after decades an ‘exciting challenge for Australia’

Heading into the tour of Pakistan in 1998, Australia had not won there since 1959. That tour back then had been decided by a one-wicket defeat in Karachi. Adding to the challenge for Mark Taylor’s team was that they were without the injured Shane Warne whose shoulder had finally given in after the tour of India earlier in the year. There was also the backdrop of the Qayyum match-fixing hearings which stemmed from Australia’s previous visit in 1994.1st Test, RawalpindiThere might have been concerns when Aamer Sohail, Pakistan’s captain, won the toss and was able to bat first but Australia’s attack were soon among the wickets. Glenn McGrath and Damien Fleming, playing together in a Test for the first time, took out the first three then there was a maiden Test wicket for Colin Miller, making his debut at the age of 34, when he removed Saleem Malik. “He was caught at second slip, low to Mark Waugh’s side. Was nearly a wide, Saleem had to reach to hit it,” Miller recalled to ESPNcricinfo.Stuart MacGill, taking the legspin duties in the absence of the injured Warne and playing just his second Test, went through the middle and lower order to leave Pakistan 147 for 8. However, Australia were then held up by a 120-run stand for the ninth wicket between Saeed Anwar, who made a masterful century, and Mushtaq Ahmed who faced 136 balls at No. 10.When Australia slipped to 28 for 3 in reply – Justin Langer and Mark Waugh collecting ducks – things looked dicey but from there the visitors dominated. Michael Slater and Steve Waugh added 198 for the fourth wicket then Waugh and Darren Lehmann built a lead with a stand of 126. When Waugh fell for 157, Lehmann got to within touch distance of a maiden century only to miss a sweep against Mohammad Hussain but Ian Healy’s 92 swelled the advantage to 244.Colin Miller in action on his Test debut•Getty ImagesPakistan crumbled in their second innings. Fleming, who had taken a hat-trick on debut during the previous tour in 1994, trapped Mohammad Wasim and Inzamam-ul-Haq lbw for ducks while MacGill again did damage to finish with nine in the match. There was a landmark for Healy, too, when he claimed a world record 355th dismissal against Wasim Akram from the bowling of Miller.”I had been bowling around the wicket for lbws, I was no chance to get them,” Miller said. “Peter Willey was the umpire and told me to go over the wicket. I got one to turn and bounce and Healy took a really good catch. I have the photo of his catch in my office, which is signed by Heals.”It was really important to stamp our authority in the first Test. I remember after the match we were going to sing the song but I didn’t know the words. Heals wrote them down on a piece of paper.”Ian Healy claims his record-breaking dismissal•AFP2nd Test, PeshawarThis was Mark Taylor’s Test. After coming through an initially hostile spell from Shoaib Akhtar he went on to equal Don Bradman’s 334 as the then highest score by an Australian in Test cricket – only denying himself the chance of setting a new benchmark by declaring before the start of the third day’s play to put the team before his personal achievements.”It was hot and humid, he was exhausted,” Miller remembered. “We had to douse him in cold towels during the breaks. You have to be there to experience that type of innings in those conditions. He could have batted for another two days because no one looked like getting him out. He was in the zone. He wanted to declare and do it for the team as it was the best chance of a victory. I was hoping he would break the record for Australia.”Mark Taylor is given a guard of honour as he leaves the field unbeaten on 334•AFPIn a column for newspapers this week, Taylor wrote: “I did consider grinding Pakistan into the dirt by batting another 20 minutes in a seventh session. That’s when the significance of Bradman’s 334 at Headingley in 1930 hit me. I thought people may think if I didn’t declare, it was to deliberately go past Bradman’s score.”I never played the game for individual records. You always play for enjoyment. Word filtered through our team, while Pakistan captain Aamer Sohail was surprised when I told him 30 minutes before play. A lot of others were, too. People thought I’d go for Brian Lara’s world record of 375 but, truthfully, that didn’t cross my mind.”I think it’s one of the best things I did, and I still have people ask me about it. I didn’t stop on Bradman’s score deliberately. That was a quirk of fate, but I’m delighted I did what I did because I think it does hopefully set an example of how sport should be played.”Taylor went on to add 92 in the second innings as the match drifted to a draw on a docile surface after Anwar and Ijaz Ahmed had plundered hundreds of their own. It gave him a match tally of 426 runs which remains the second highest in a Test behind Graham Gooch’s 456 against India in 1990.3rd Test, KarachiMark Waugh’s century ensured Australia could not lose the final Test•AFPThe series concluded at a ground where Pakistan had not lost in 33 previous Tests. Both teams went with three frontline spinners (although Miller’s versatility as a seamer gave Australia balance) and the ball held sway over the first two innings. Slater played with great restraint in making 96 off 257 balls – the second slowest of his Test scores over 50 – but Healy’s 47 was the next best as debutant Shahid Afridi claimed 5 for 52.However, Australia’s 280 proved very competitive and a big lead was in the offing when Pakistan crashed to 69 for 5. Sohail found support from the lower order and complied a brilliant century but McGrath’s 5 for 66 kept Australia ahead in the game.Taylor laid the platform for what became a series-clinching second innings with 68 then Mark Waugh’s century took Australia into an impregnable position alongside Gavin Robertson’s useful 45 at No. 8 as they opted to bat out the fourth day rather than declare.A target of 419 was never within the realms for Pakistan and Miller’s burst early on the final day left them 35 for 3 with Australia sensing the chance to take the series 2-0. But Ijaz held firm, adding 153 for the fifth wicket with Moin Khan although Australia were more than content with the outcome.”That Pakistan team was really strong with so many superstars,” Miller said. “It was one of our finest achievements to beat them over there.”

Stats – Indian bowlers in high demand as 24 players get million-dollar bids

Overall, INR 388.35 crore was spent by the 10 franchises to buy 74 players on Saturday – 41 capped and 33 uncapped players

Sampath Bandarupalli12-Feb-2022Millionaires galore on day one
The opening day of the Indian Premier League (IPL) auction for the 2022 season witnessed as many as 24 players earning million-dollar bids (INR 7.5 crore and more). Fifteen of those were Indian players, including four uncapped ones. Overall, INR 388.35 crore was spent by the 10 franchises to buy 74 players on Saturday – 41 capped and 33 uncapped players.ESPNcricinfo LtdIndian bowlers on demand
Across the first 14 editions of the IPL, only one Indian bowler had attracted a bid of more than INR 10 crore at the IPL auction – Jaydev Unadkat in 2018 when Rajasthan Royals got him for 11.5 crore. However, five bowlers joined the list on Saturday, with the highest being INR 14 crore for Deepak Chahar. Harshal Patel and Shardul Thakur got bids of 10.75 crore, while Prasidh Krishna and Avesh Khan earned 10 crore each.

Pacers trump spinners
On the whole, INR 155.35 crore was spent on the 27 pacers compared to INR 101.1 crore on the 22 spin bowlers, across the allrounder and bowler sets on the first day of the auction. Seven of those players earned more than INR 10 crore but only one of them bowls spin – Wanindu Hasaranga. This indicated franchises’ bias in spending money on the pace bowlers who were successful in the last couple of seasons.

West Indians earn big
West Indian players have always been crucial to their respective franchises in the IPL but seldom earned big money during their time at the auction. Until 2021, the highest bid for a West Indian was INR 8.5 crore which Sheldon Cottrell got from Kings XI Punjab (now Punjab Kings) in 2020. However, three players managed to match that in 2022 – Nicholas Pooran, Jason Holder and Shimron Hetmyer. Hasaranga also broke his country record for the highest auction price with the Royal Challengers Bangalore paying him 10.75 crore. The previous highest bid for a Sri Lankan was INR 7.5 crore by the Delhi franchise in 2015.

Mumbai and Chennai enter new areas
ESPNcricinfo LtdMumbai Indians managed to get back Ishan Kishan but had to spend INR 15.25 crore, one of the highest-ever price tags in the IPL auctions. Before this auction, the franchise had not spent 10 or more crore on any player. The previous highest buy of the five-time Champions was Rohit Sharma, their current skipper, whom they got for approx. 9.2 crore in 2011 ($2 Million). Kishan also became the second more expensive Indian buy at the auctions, behind Yuvraj Singh’s 16 crore bid in 2015 by Delhi Daredevils (now Capitals).ESPNcricinfo LtdAnother successful franchise, Chennai Super Kings also had a similar fate to get back Deepak Chahar, who played a vital role in their two titles. Their winning bid for Chahar was 14 crore, well more than their previous highest buy – Ravindra Jadeja. Super Kings had bought Jadeja in 2012 for approx. 9.8 crore ($2 Million).Avesh’s big jump
ESPNcricinfo LtdLucknow Super Giants’ bid of 10 crore for Avesh was not only one of the highest bids made for an Indian bowler, but the first instance of an uncapped player earning a bid of ten or more crore at the IPL auctions. Avesh’s auction price was 50 times his base price of 20 lakhs, the highest jump ever seen in the history of IPL auctions. K Gowtham held both records – having earned INR 9.25 crore from an INR 20 lakh base price in 2021.

Jack Leach grateful for change of luck on day of hard toil

Spinner enjoys bizarre moment of success as part of 30-over workload at Headingley

Vithushan Ehantharajah23-Jun-2022For a player who has had more than his fair share of tough breaks, even in this New Zealand series alone, few could begrudge Jack Leach “prising out” Henry Nicholls in the manner he did on day one of the third and final Test.Having used his feet superbly to get to the pitch of the ball, Nicholls thumped a half-volley down the ground, seemingly for four. However in the process of taking evasive action at the non-striker’s end, Daryl Mitchell deflected the strike off the face of the bat and into the hands of Alex Lees at mid-off.”Never seen anything like it,” Leach said, sporting a broad smile in the post-match press conference. “It was very lucky for me, very unlucky for Nicholls.Related

'It's a stupid game that we play' – Jack Leach reflects on moment of Black Cap comedy

Daryl Mitchell, Tom Blundell thwart England in familiar fashion after bizarre breakthrough

“I don’t like those wickets really. I like it because it says two wickets on the board. But you have to take it. It’s not going to be something that I’m going to re-watch many times.”That Leach ended up playing a big part for England on the opening day tells you all you need to know about the Headingley surface they were dealing with after Kane Williamson won the toss and chose to bat. There was no other call to make on a hard surface which looked the palest of the three served up this series and you could argue the hosts did well to ensure day two begins with New Zealand 225 for 5.Leach, however, relished the opportunity to send down 30 of the 90 overs, for figures of 2 for 75. He struck with his first delivery, trapping opening batter Will Young lbw from around the wicket.”It’s nice to get into the game early as a spinner. Getting a wicket early eases everything for you, too.”The weather and wicket – it was good toil out there. I tried to be as aggressive as I could. I knew they were going to come at me.”Leach was also one of two cap presentations on Thursday morning, as he received his 25th Test cap by James Anderson shortly before Jamie Overton received a first from twin brother, Craig. Leach was typically humble about the occasion, even if his current statistics of 84 wickets and average of 33.57 are enough to reflect he has certainly not wasted those appearances.”I’m just happy to be out there playing. To reach 25 caps was a bit of a surprise. I thought I was on 24. It’s a nice little milestone. Makes you proud of what you achieved. I didn’t think I’d get one, so it’s special. Nice to get it from a legend and someone who helped me from my game [Anderson].”The parallels between his career overall and the series were also worthy of note, especially after a concussion on the first day at Lord’s, which ruled him out of the rest of that first Test. It continued a trend of unfortunate injuries picked up at inopportune times. Indeed the wicket of Nicholls might suggest his luck is changing, at the ground where he played a historic support act to Ben Stokes against Australia in 2019.”[It’s been] very much up and down,” he said of the last few weeks. “Like most of my career. Lord’s was a freak – just trying to run to the boundary like our coach used to do. Didn’t quite go to plan and then it was about being ready for Trent Bridge. That was an amazing game to be part of. I didn’t feel I bowled as well as I could. Probably due to the lead-up to that game. Today I felt in pretty good rhythm. It’s great to be back here.”

Game
Register
Service
Bonus