Aston Villa must land Tomas Soucek transfer

Aston Villa have shown over the past few years that they aren’t shy when it comes to securing transfers for players from fellow Premier League clubs.

The likes of Danny Ings, Calum Chambers and Emi Martinez, among others, have all made moves to Villa Park from other top-flight teams.

Now that the Villans are in the midst of yet another summer transfer window, this period could give them the opportunity to continue their track record of signing players with whom they are familiar from facing in league action.

One Premier League player who has been mentioned with a move to Steven Gerrard’s side this time around is West Ham United midfielder Tomas Soucek.

After initially joining the east London club on loan from Slavia Prague in January 2020, the midfielder secured a permanent transfer the following summer on a four-year deal worth €21m (£18m).

Overall, the 27-year-old has made 101 appearances for David Moyes’ side across all competitions, scoring 18 goals and providing two assists along the way.

Another Premier League midfielder who is included on a list of similar players to Soucek according to Football Transfers is Chelsea’s N’Golo Kante.

Bearing in mind how the Frenchman has won multiple trophies for club and country, along with numerous individual awards, this shows the pedigree of the Stamford Bridge stalwart.

To compare the duo from their previous domestic campaigns, both players ended the season with more than 100 tackles and interceptions combined, highlighting how impressive they both are without the ball and how capable they are at winning it back.

Labelled a “huge” player for West Ham by Jamie Carragher, Soucek has also been hailed as “magnificent” by Trevor Sinclair regarding the defensive work that he puts in for his team.

Taking all this into account, the prospect of Gerrard having his own version of Kante at Villa in the shape of the Czech Republic star could be a very exciting prospect for everyone connected with the Midlands club.

With a reported price tag of £40m, securing a deal for the West Ham machine could be a very smart bit of business for Villa and something that they should definitely explore before the transfer window closes.

AND in other news: Reliable journalist claims Villa move would be “attractive” for 6 foot 1 “rock”, Gerrard will love it

Tottenham: Jones makes exciting Spence claim as talks advance

Journalist Dean Jones of GiveMeSport has now made an exciting Tottenham Hotspur claim as talks advance for Middlesbrough starlet Djed Spence.

The Lowdown: Conte eyeing move…

The Championship defender, after enjoying a brilliant spell on loan at Nottingham Forest over 2021/2022, has since been attracting real interest from Spurs in the Premier League.

As backed by Sky Sports, chairman Daniel Levy has even personally intervened in attempt to push through a move for the 21-year-old as sporting director Fabio Paratici concentrates on other targets.

Right-wing-back, alongside the possible additions of a centre-back and striker, are said to be high priority at Hotspur Way with Jones now sharing an exciting Spence update.

The Latest: Jones shares exciting update…

Speaking to GiveMeSport, the reporter has now shared some positive news for Lilywhites supporters on the chase for Spence.

[web_stories_embed url=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/web-stories/tottenham-latest-developments-2/” title=”Tottenham latest updates” poster=”” width=”360″ height=”600″ align=”none”]

He explained:

“Spurs are refusing to be rushed into paying over the odds for Spence but talks are progressing and there’s a general feeling that they should have him on board in time for pre-season.”

The Verdict: Promising…

We believe the defender should be next in line to arrive at Tottenham, especially considering he could solve many glaring issues both and off the field.

Spurs’ troubling homegrown quota issue has been well documented and landing another Englishman on the books will seriously boost the club in terms of fixing this.

Spence’s quality is also evident, having turned heads on loan at Forest during their promotion push.

The Boro ace, called a ‘perfect player for Conte’ by talkSPORT’s Alex Crook, could certainly be a shrewd addition for the club.

Mount could be Fernandes 2.0 at MUFC

Erik ten Hag is reportedly plotting a shock move for Chelsea midfielder Mason Mount this summer and if he were to join Manchester United, he could be Bruno Fernandes 2.0 at Old Trafford.

It was reported recently that United are keeping an eye on the England international’s contract situation at Stamford Bridge following their recent takeover, with suggestions that they have already made contact with the player’s camp.

They also suggest that ten Hag has been following his progress since a loan spell with Vitesse Arnhem, and claim that Mount would jump at the chance to move to the north-west.

If he were to make the switch this summer, then the 23-year-old could be a superb addition to ten Hag’s squad, and could even replicate the performances of Fernandes.

The Portugal international has contributed 50 goals and 39 assists for the Red Devils since joining from Sporting Lisbon in January 2020.

Fbref suggests that Mount is very similar to the Portuguese midfielder, while WhoScored suggests that both Mount and Fernandes’ strengths include key passes and long shots, while both prefer to play layoffs.

[snack-amp-story url= “https://www.footballfancast.com/web-stories/read-the-latest-man-united-news-transfer-rumours-gossip-and-more-nunez-ten-hag-nkunku-richarlison” title=”Read the latest Man United news!”]

The 23-year-old has established himself as a key player for Chelsea following an impressive loan spell with Derby County in the Championship, where he contributed 11 goals and six assists in 44 appearances.

He has since gone on to make 160 appearances for the Blues, in which he has notched 30 goals and 31 assists, an impressive return for someone so young.

Former Chelsea man Joe Cole was full of praise for Mount after he starred in the 7-0 demolition of Norwich last season, saying:

“He doesn’t [get the credit] he deserves – he does from people within the game. I’ve never met one ex-player or one coach who doesn’t appreciate him.

“He’s a top, top outstanding player, he’s becoming one of the most important players in the country.

“But there is an unusual level of fans – I don’t know if it’s rival fans or whatever – who don’t quite get it.

“You want to sit them down in front of a touchscreen and educate them and show them that what this kid does is just unbelievable.”

Reports have suggested that Mount is valued at £70m by Chelsea but considering he is only 23, and seems to perform on a similar level as Fernandes, he could prove to be a superb addition to ten Hag’s side.

And, in other news… MUFC now “interested” in signing “unreal” 52-goal star, just imagine him & Ronaldo

West Ham: Thomas slams Fabianski

The Athletic’s West Ham United correspondent Roshane Thomas was critical of Lukasz Fabianski as the Hammers capitulated against Brighton on Sunday. 

The lowdown: Europa League missed

For large parts of the day, it appeared as though David Moyes’ side would be competing in the Europa League once again, as Manchester United’s defeat to Crystal Palace opened the door for the Hammers to move into sixth if they could win at the Amex Stadium.

Having reached the semi-final this term, the Irons will undoubtedly be disappointed to miss out and be left with Europa Conference League football, particularly having taken the lead through Michail Antonio on the south coast.

[web_stories_embed url=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/web-stories/west-ham-latest-developments-5/” title=”West Ham latest developments!” poster=”” width=”360″ height=”600″ align=”none”]

However, goals from Pascal Gross, Danny Welbeck and Joel Veltman punished a lacklustre West Ham performance, and one man came in for criticism for his role in the defeat…

The latest: Thomas slams Fabianski over Veltman goal

Taking to Twitter, Thomas lamented the part that veteran goalkeeper Fabianski played in Brighton’s equaliser as Veltman fired the home side level early in the second half.

Giving updates throughout the match, the journalist initially posted: “1-1, Veltman scores for Brighton. Fabianski could have done better. #WHUFC”

Despite being informed on the social media platform of a deflection on the strike, the journalist doubled down on his assessment soon after: “I missed the deflection. Still should have saved it though.”

The verdict: A sign of things to come?

Few could question the continued quality of Fabianski this season, as the experienced Pole made 38 appearances across all competitions for the Hammers and was their seventh-best player in the Premier League according to WhoScored metrics.

This display was far from a peak performance from the stopper, though, as the 57-cap stalwart gave away possession 17 times and misplaced 16 passes and 16 long balls whilst earning a lowly 6.40 Sofascore rating on an afternoon to forget.

Having watched Alphonse Areola perform so admirably in Europe this term, and with the Frenchman potentially staying in east London next season, perhaps there is a decision to be made by Moyes regarding who should be the Irons’ first-choice Premier League goalkeeper for 2022/23.

In other news: ‘Close…’ – Sky Sports journalist shares major West Ham development from the last 72 hours! Find out more here

Liverpool dealt with injury doubt

Liverpool kept their Premier League title dreams alive against Aston Villa last night, however, the victory was bittersweet after an in-game injury worry occurred in the first half of the clash.

What’s the latest?

Fabinho hobbled off the pitch in the first half an hour of the game at Villa Park on Tuesday night and now Jurgen Klopp has given an update on the midfielder’s condition following the full-time whistle.

[snack-amp-story url=”https://www.footballfancast.com/web-stories/read-the-latest-liverpool-news-transfer-rumours-gossip-salah-gnabry-isak-romano” title= “Read the latest Liverpool news!”]

Jurgen Klopp updated in his post-match interview on Sky Sports casting doubt on his player’s condition (via Metro):

‘That’s a massive problem. That’s a big blow for us. I don’t know (how bad), hopefully not that bad, but I don’t know.’

Klopp will be frustrated

There is no doubt that the Liverpool manager will be massively frustrated to potentially lose such a key player in his team ahead of the FA Cup final and Champions League final coming up over the next few weeks.

The Brazilian midfielder has been one of the most influential players in the centre of the pitch and has been integral in Liverpool’s chase for multiple trophies this season so to lose him when the side has one hand on two huge trophies is a massive blow.

Fabinho has been involved in Liverpool’s incredible 17-game unbeaten run, scoring four goals during this time as well as providing consistent solid defensive performances in his role in the centre of the pitch.

According to SofaScore, the Liverpool star has been successful in an impressive 73% of his dribbles, wins 63% of his aerial duels and makes 1.6 tackles and 1.4 interceptions on average per game in the Premier League this season.

Anfield and Brazil teammate Alisson Becker even called Fabinho “the most important” player for Liverpool and his national team in an interview:

“I believe that Fabinho is the most important player for both the club and the national team, this is my opinion about that, he’s a very important player wherever he is, he always proves his worth on the pitch.”

With that being said, there will surely be a further update on the star player’s condition ahead of the Chelsea clash on Saturday afternoon at Wembley and supporters will be anxiously hoping for positive news on Fabinho’s availability.

AND in other news: Klopp must now finally axe Liverpool gem who lost the ball every 3 touches yesterday

Which is England's most shocking loss?

England have been on the wrong end of some big upsets in ICC events and were surprised once again in this World Cup, by Sri Lanka. Which of these defeats was the most surprising?

ESPNcricinfo staff22-Jun-2019England have been on the wrong end of some big upsets in ICC events and were surprised once again in this World Cup, by Sri Lanka. Which of these defeats was the most surprising?

New Zealand still trying to fill the shoes of 2015 World Cup heroes

Halfway between World Cups, New Zealand remain in search of an XI that shores up holes left by 2015 linchpins Brendon McCullum, Daniel Vettori and Grant Elliott

Andrew McGlashan in Cardiff09-Jun-2017The brevity of the Champions Trophy can make assessment of a team’s fortunes difficult, and potentially a little unfair, especially when the weather has intervened. New Zealand played down any frustration after being denied a likely victory over Australia. Who knows whether it actually did knock the wind out of their sails.Ultimately, however, in the two matches unaffected by the weather they have come up short and are the first side in the tournament to slope off home needing to digest what went wrong. This competition brings an end to an extensive period of action for them which began back in South Africa last August and only really stopped for the IPL, in which a host of key names were involved, and is a chance to take stock at the midway point to the next World Cup.The side that reached the final of the 2015 World Cup came during a golden age for New Zealand and losing Brendon McCullum, Daniel Vettori and Grant Elliott were shoes of varying vastness to fill. However, the game moves on and one wonders if New Zealand have. Three players from that 2015 side were recalled for this tournament – Corey Anderson, Adam Milne and the unused Mitchell McClenaghan. Milne certainly deserves a pass mark, his pace eye-catching and his slower balls deceptive, but Anderson’s batting appears to have regressed.If New Zealand want to be a force again in two years’ time, at the 2019 World Cup on these shores, there needs to be a period of introspection. This side has two of the best one-day cricketers, Kane Williamson and Trent Boult, and three more very fine players: Martin Guptill, Ross Taylor and Tim Southee. Four of them stood out against Bangladesh – Williamson and Taylor laying another solid base for the innings, then Southee and Boult finding new-ball movement that has been elusive in this tournament – but still the team came up short. That suggests outside of that core there is a soft underbelly.Nothing better illustrates that than the trio of performances from the middle order in this tournament: against Australia they lost 7 for 37, against England 8 for 65 and against Bangladesh 5 for 51. They each came in tricky circumstances – two trying to accelerate the innings batting first and the other in a tough chase – and while, ideally, a team wants a set batsman to see through an innings, finishing is what the middle and lower order is there to do. The slumps are a pattern that can’t be ignored.ESPNcricinfo LtdThe innings against Bangladesh could have taken a different course if it had not been for Williamson’s self-inflicted run-out, but the captain can hardly have done much more over three matches with 244 runs. He needs some help. And, still, after that New Zealand had placed themselves on 201 for 3 with 11 overs to go when Taylor was deceived by Taskin Ahmed. They then proceeded to lose three wickets to the gentle offspin of Mosaddek Hossain before being shackled by the yorker skill of Rubel Hossain and Mustafizur Rahman.”We certainly didn’t play our best cricket,” Williamson said. “We were in a position of strength with the bat, and if things were to go our way we know we have a lot of power in that middle, lower order. They are very talented. In such a short tournament, you want everyone firing and it wasn’t to be. We left a few runs out there.”Between them Neil Broom, James Neesham and Anderson scored 126 runs in nine innings with a top individual effort being Broom’s 36 off 40 balls against Bangladesh. Guptill needed to convert his starts as well, but he has an impressive record behind him. Broom is a 33-year-old who was tempted out of a county contract with Derbyshire for a second crack at international cricket. Neesham averages 27.03 after 41 ODIs. Since the 2015 World Cup, Anderson’s top score in 14 ODIs is 35, albeit through multiple injuries during that time.”Everyone sets out to perform their role as best they can and give to the side and play selfless cricket and that’s certainly the attitude of the players,” Williamson said. “In such a short tournament it perhaps appears to highlight certain areas that you want to strengthen. But we know in the past those guys have been playing some really good cricket. So we back every one of them, and we need to use this tournament to get better.”The roles of Neesham and Anderson also impact the bowling attack, the former being a weaker link than the latter who showed some signs of regaining his golden-arm touch from the World Cup. Against Bangladesh, Neesham’s introduction in the 15th over was a point where Bangladesh started their revival as they found a way to release the pressure built up by Southee’s opening seven-over spell of 3 for 26. Shakib ended Neesham’s first over with a four through extra cover. Mahmudullah pulled him for a six and a four off consecutive deliveries in the 19th over to knock him out of the attack before he returned in the 44th for one final fruitless over.2:36

Fleming: Neesham & Anderson’s future spots in question

From the 15-man squad on duty for this tournament, Colin de Grandhomme might have been a better option than either Neesham or Anderson as an allrounder. De Grandhomme bowled effectively at times against South Africa earlier this year and is more adept, at least of late, of finding the boundary early in an innings.There is a more limited supply of talent in New Zealand than many of the other major nations, but that has always been the case. It has been a source of pride, and often a great success story, that they have made those resources stretch as far as possible.With that in mind it does seem a waste that Tom Latham was sidelined in this one-day side, especially after showing excellent form in the tri-series played in Dublin ahead of the Champions Trophy where a century against Ireland was sandwiched by scores of 54 and 84 against Bangladesh. Latham went through a lean run in the New Zealand home summer, and was part of the muddled thinking over the wicketkeeping role which saw Luke Ronchi given a late promotion to open, but remains someone who could form a solid foil with Guptill.For other answers, that will require assessing what is back home. There was a glimpse at some of them during the tri-series in Ireland – George Worker, Seth Rance and Scott Kuggeleijn – while batsman Tom Bruce and wicketkeeper Tom Blundell had a brief taste last season. But there is not a magic solution. A few tough decisions may need to be made.Global tournaments are normally New Zealand’s place to show what they are made of, but on this occasion rather than punching above their weight they have been knocked to the canvas.

Torrid Footitt presses for a Test debut

Mark Footitt is eager for an opportunity at Centurion, knowing that chances of a Test debut do not come along all that often when you have had your 30th birthday

George Dobell20-Jan-2016Had a stranger wandered into England’s net session in Centurion on Wednesday, they could have been forgiven for concluding that Mark Footitt was the outstanding bowler in the squad.Footitt, bowling with pace and skill, made life torrid for all the batsmen. Jonny Bairstow, arguably England’s man of the series, was twice drawn into edges, while James Taylor was beaten like a snare drum. The rest of the bowlers, despite habitually overstepping – a habit that might be best stamped out, even in such sessions – were unable to match his hostility.But you have to be careful with training sessions. While the more established bowlers know not to expend their energy two days before a game, those on the periphery know that is a rare chance to impress. And Footitt knows that, with Steven Finn unavailable due to injury, he is rivalling Chris Jordan and Chris Woakes for a call up. He must fear that the Test in Pretoria might offer a last chance for him.Footitt is a fine bowler. Since the start of the 2014 season, he has claimed 162 first-class wickets at an average of 21.46. While the vast majority of those have been taken in Division Two of the County Championship, where the standards of batting and pitches is not the highest, they are still impressive figures.With his left-arm pace, his new-found control and an ability, at his best, to shape the ball back into the right hander, he has developed into a dangerous, consistent bowler. Graeme Welch, the Derbyshire coach who had notable success with Keith Barker, Chris Wright and Rikki Clarke while bowling coach at Warwickshire, deserves some of the credit.Footitt was a little wayward in the warm-up matches. But some nerves were understandable and he has now had a couple of months in which to settle into the England environment. Moeen Ali would doubtless appreciate the footmarks he would cultivate if he played, too, while the variety would give the attack a fresh look.But Footitt is 30 years old and has recently moved from Derbyshire to Surrey. He will find the pay outstanding at The Oval but the pitches heartbreaking. Just ask Stuart Meaker or Chris Tremlett. With younger men – the Currans, the Overtons, David Willey, Reece Topley et al – breaking through and a winter in Asia beckoning at the end of 2016, it is hard to see where future opportunities may lie.England’s recent history would suggest that Woakes is the likely beneficiary of Finn’s injury. Quite rightly, he is highly thought of within the management team and bowled well without reward in Durban. He is the more likely to retain control – his career economy-rate is 3.05 compared to Footitt’s 3.50 – and his first-class record – 358 wickets at an average of 25.42 – has generally been earned in Division One of the County Championship. He has the ability to move the ball both ways in the right conditions and is a good enough batsman to have made eight first-class centuries: he made his Test debut at No. 6.The management of this team is relatively new, however, and may not judge “bowling dry” quite as importantly as previous regimes. And with Moeen Ali at No. 8, the batting of the third seamer should not be a priority.To the naked eye, Footitt looks the quicker bowler. But perhaps that is just due to the tangle of arms and legs you see just before he delivers. Hawkeye would suggest that Woakes, measured as the fastest bowler on either side during the Durban Test, is every bit as quick.But batsmen do tend to say that Woakes, with his smooth, straight action, is easier to pick-up than some, even if he has started to hide the ball in his run-up in the manner of James Anderson or, before him Zaheer Khan. He seems relatively unloved on social media but very highly rated by his fellow professionals.Chris Woakes bowled well without luck in Durban•Getty ImagesYou could make an argument that Footitt is a more convincing like-for-like replacement for Finn. It is true that both are aggressive bowlers who are liable to concede a few more runs than the dependable Woakes, who might be seen as a more like-for-like replacement for Anderson. But Woakes, effectively the man in possession after playing in Durban, is the one seen as having a future at this level. It would be a surprise if he did not play.There is another option, but it is an unlikely one. England could leave out James Anderson – not ‘drop,’ just leave out in the knowledge that the series is won and they need to keep an eye on the future – and play both Woakes and Footitt. Given Anderson’s workload following this game, however – he will not bowl again in anger until April at least – and his admirable desire to represent England on every possible occasion, it seems almost unthinkable that he will be asked to sit this one out.One man that Footitt did not beat in the nets was Nick Compton. Compton admitted that he had been perturbed enough by Trevor Bayliss’ comments following the first Test – comments which suggested that he would, in an ideal world, prefer a more free-scoring batsman at No. 3 than Compton – to seek clarification from his coach. Upon reflection, and after a couple of odd innings, it seems Compton will be content to revert to the sheet anchor role.”I had a chat with Trevor about it, but there was no inference that was the way he wanted me to play,” Compton said. “He just wanted to make it clear that’s in an ideal world. But I’ve been selected for the reasons that I do what I do and he’s been very clear about me doing that role as well as I can.”It would nice to whack it like David Warner or de Villiers. Wouldn’t we all like to do things differently and better? But having done a bit of that as a youngster and tried different things, I’m settled on what I do.”There’s probably been times when I’ve been frustrated at how I’ve got out, I have perhaps got just a little bit ahead of myself and chased one too many balls.”I’m proud of what I do and I feel strongly that I have qualities and attributes that yes, might not be as glamorous as others at this time and place in life, but still have a big part to play. We know big hundreds and batting for long periods of time is what’s important in Test match cricket.”We know the new ball is a tough place to bat but, if I can get in and stay in, then I’m doing a good job for the guys. From a personal position, hopefully you get in and you cash in.”Compton, at least, is all but certain to win another chance to show what he can contribute at this level. It is an opportunity Mark Footitt might never have.

The 'baby Invincible' who always stood tall

The great Australian batsman always did justice to his precociousness and reputation for being adept in all conditions

Ashley Mallett18-Oct-2014With a gleam in his eye and a skip in his step, Neil Harvey pounced on the ball like a cat nailing a mouse.Harvey danced yards down the wicket to get to the pitch of the ball from the slow bowlers, yet he was never out stumped in Test cricket despite having batted against some of the finest spinners of any era. Arguably the best Australian batsman since Don Bradman, Harvey played 79 Tests, hitting 6149 runs at 48.41, with 21 hundreds and a highest score of 205.He scored his first Test century (153) against India in the Melbourne Test of 1947-48. From the outset of the 1948 tour, 19-year-old Harvey absorbed as much information as he could from old campaigners like Arthur Morris, Lindsay Hassett, Keith Miller, Ray Lindwall and Bill Johnston.However, he struggled to come to terms with the slow, seaming English tracks. After four matches he was averaging seven and he felt he needed some wise counsel. Hesitant to approach Bradman, he asked his room-mate, fellow Victorian Sam Loxton if he would talk to the Don.Sam sidled up to his captain and asked, “George [curiously he always called Bradman “George”], what’s young Harvey doing wrong?” Bradman looked Loxton straight in the eye and said matter-of-factly, “Sam, you go and tell your little mate that if he doesn’t hit the ball in the air he can’t get out.”Soon runs started to flow for Harvey; an unbeaten 76 against Lancashire and he was on his way. Then Sid Barnes got injured and Harvey was picked to bat at No. 5 in the Leeds Test. Three quick wickets fell – Morris (6), Hassett (13) and Bradman (33) – before Harvey strode to the crease.”Keith Miller was in at the time and he told me he would take to the bowling,” Harvey said. “First ball from [Jim] Laker, he clubbed straight over my head for six and I thought, ‘How good is this, might not be as tough as I thought.'”In 90 minutes, Harvey and Miller hit 121, the youngster getting more confident, especially against Laker, whose turn worried him early on, and when Miller fell for 58, Harvey was joined by Loxton, who took over the assault. Their partnership of 105 came in a hurricane 95 minutes, with Loxton, who smashed five sixes, falling seven runs short of a century, and Harvey going on to score his first hundred against England.In South Africa in 1949-50 he hit 660 runs in the five Tests at a Bradman-like average of 132, which included an extraordinary unbeaten 151 in Durban. Bowled out for just 75 on a treacherous Kingsmead wicket, Australia were set a target of 336. Harvey was the key. He used his twinkling footwork to hammer Hugh Tayfield and Tufty Mann, ensuring a wonderful comeback victory.

“My first ball was quick and moved late from leg stump to a little outside off and I thought, ‘Hey that’s a beauty!’ Harv moved back and across and hit the ball like a rocket in front of point for four”Alan Davidson

Harvey starred in the first Test match I ever witnessed. My granddad took me along to the second Test of the 1954-55 Ashes hoping I’d see an Australian win. After all, England were defending a shade over 200 runs.And victory might have been achieved but for a man named Frank Tyson. This, after getting battered to the tune of 1 for 160 off 29 overs in Brisbane a few weeks before. “Typhoon” Tyson bowled on this last day with the wind behind him to take 6 for 85 in 18.4 overs of unrelenting hostility. All the while the “pocket dynamo” that was Harvey hooked, pulled, cut and drove in a magnificent display of aggression. One hook for six went away to where we sat in front of the Noble Stand and bounced over the fence and into the visitors’ dressing room. Les Favell’s 16 was the next-best score, and when the ninth wicket fell, Australia needed 78, and in strolled the perennial No. 11, Bill Johnston, carrying his trusty heavily bandaged bat. Harvey met big Bill with a cheery, “Let’s go for them, mate”.Big Bill hung in there while Harvey cut loose and they put on 39 before Johnston tickled one down the leg side and Godfrey Evans did the rest. Australia all out 184, Harvey not out 92, England won by 38 runs.At least there was some light relief during the match. As Jim Burke’s laborious 44 neared its end in the first dig, Yabba, the SCG’s most famous barracker, yelled from the outer: “Hey Burkey, you are so like a statue, I wish I was a pigeon.”Harvey’s batting delighted the likes of Yabba and thousands of fans worldwide. Not only did he conquer all manner of spinners, including Laker, Tony Lock, Sonny Ramadhin and Subhash Gupte, he succeeded against some of the greatest fast bowlers to walk the Test stage; bowlers like England’s Tyson, Statham, Alec Bedser and Fred Trueman, South Africa’s Peter Heine and Neil Adcock; West Indians Wes Hall and Garry Sobers.In the wake of the retirements of Ian Johnson and Miller, the Australian selectors surprisingly chose 22-year-old New South Wales captain Ian Craig to lead the national team ahead of Harvey and Richie Benaud. In 1956-57, ahead of the South African tour later in the year, two Sheffield Shield captains, Harvey (Victoria) and Craig (NSW) met on the field for the toss, which Craig won and asked Victoria to bat.Minutes before the toss, Victorian opening batsman Colin McDonald deflected a ball into his face in the nets and as Craig and Harvey were about to toss, Harvey asked Craig for a gentleman’s agreement to allow a substitute for McDonald. Craig refused, citing the importance of the match.Alan Davidson, the Australia and NSW allrounder, noted a rare angry reaction from Harvey, who came out to bat wearing the look of a man going to war.”Harv smashed us all over the place,” Davidson said. “We started the match at 11am and at 2pm Victoria had already scored 200 and I took the second new ball. My first ball was quick and moved late from leg stump to a little outside off and I thought, ‘Hey that’s a beauty!’ Harv moved back and across and hit the ball like a rocket in front of point for four. In fact, it was hit with such power the ball struck the pickets and rebounded 10 metres back into the playing area. Neil’s 209 was a brilliant knock. I rate Neil the best batsman in any of the Australian teams in which I played.”

****

Harvey was one of six brothers. His father Horace taught them all to play the game and they trained on the cobbled laneway next to the family home in Fitzroy. Neil’s elder brother Merv played one Test for Australia, while Mick and Ray both played for Victoria. And all six Harvey brothers (including Brian and Harold) played for Fitzroy in Victorian district cricket.Neil Harvey was hard to dislodge even on turning tracks in India and was never stumped in his Test career•Getty ImagesMost of the brothers played baseball and Neil was twice named in the All-Australian baseball team. He had a brilliant fast arm and he could field anywhere, from the covers to the slips.Many believe Harvey would have made a fabulous Test captain. He led the side once at Lord’s in 1961 when Benaud withdrew through injury, Harvey’s men won the Test.Harvey was a Test selector for 12 years, and in 1980, while playing in a golf four at Pennant Hills with Ian Chappell, Brian Taber and Graeme Watson, Harvey told Chappelli that it was he who convinced his fellow selectors that the time had come for Bill Lawry to go and Ian Chappell to take over.”Don [Bradman] wasn’t too keen on the idea and he believed that Ian wasn’t the right bloke for the job, but Chappelli became the captain and Don was wrong,” Harvey said.As a youngster, South Africa’s champion batsman Graeme Pollock was inspired by Harvey’s cricket and he remained his hero, proving that even heroes have heroes.The year 2014 has been a sad one for the Harvey family when Harvey lost his beloved wife, Barbara, recently.The “baby” of Don Bradman’s Invincibles turned 86 the other day. Among the well-wishers were fellow 1948 player Arthur Morris, Davidson and Ken Archer. Neil Harvey is greatly admired as a cricketer and a bloke throughout the cricketing firmament.

How important is Pietersen to England's chances?

Pietersen is a wonderfully talented batsman who puts bums on seats, but what he has not done consistently is carry the England team on his back and win games

Cricinfo25-Feb-2013Getty ImagesAustralia rejoices and England frets as Kevin Pietersen, statistically the best batsman in the England side, undergoes Achilles surgery and misses the rest of the Ashes. However, is he really that important to England’s prospects? Perhaps not, especially if we use the criteria of Test hundreds and the circumstances they were made in.To my mind, Pietersen has played only one truly great innings – his 158 versus Australia at the Oval in 2005. There, under extreme pressure, with England’s grip on the Ashes marginal, he took the Australian’s apart like no other Englishman since Ian Botham in 1986-87.Since then, there have been two innings against Sri Lanka in 2006, which were big and full of exciting and innovative shots, but only his 142 at Birmingham could be justified as being ‘special’ to one degree or another. His runs against Pakistan, Australia, and the West Indies in subsequent series were made on either on flat pitches or against poor attacks.His hundreds against India were good, but unrewarded. However, Pietersen did nothing against Sri Lanka. Twice he came to England’s rescue home and away against New Zealand, but again while these were crucial innings given the state of the matches, both were made against woefully inadequate attacks.Since then, there have been three centuries against very good attacks (South Africa and India) and one against an average attack while waiting for a declaration. The record in those three games where he hit a century – one England win. That makes 16 hundreds. The win/draw/loss ratio for those hundreds is seven wins, eight draws and one loss.There are four nineties, but of those, only two are noteworthy – 97 versus West Indies at Jamaica earlier this year and a 94 against South Africa at Birmingham in August 2008. They are noteworthy because they both ended with his wicket being given away to mediocre spinners and England losing the Test. England have lost three of the games where he scored nineties.Therefore I would argue, Pietersen is a wonderfully talented batsman who puts bums on seats, he can take any attack apart given favourable conditions and circumstances, he has a great average and an exceptional conversion ratio. However, what he has not done consistently is carry the England team on his back and win games. Sleep easy England.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus